Public COA audit
AOD9604
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.4%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-5AD5-2603-1
- Identity method
- FTIR (USP <197A>) and HPLC (USP <621>)
- Sample date
- 2026-04-02
- Issue date
- 2026-04-05
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
FTIR sample spectrum confirms the presence of AOD9604 with addition of excipient(s)/fillers
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.4%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
10.2 EU/vial (limit: 40 EU/vial)
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity achieved
99.4% purity by HPLC (USP <621>) exceeds specification of ≥98%. This is normal for research-grade peptides.
Identity confirmed by FTIR
FTIR spectrum confirms AOD9604 presence with excipients/fillers noted.
Batch/lot number present
Lot CR-5AD5-2603-1 clearly documented across all pages.
Dates are consistent and recent
Sample tested 4/2/2026, COA issued 4/5/2026, endotoxin test dated 4/8/2026 and issued 4/10/2026. All dates are consistent and within normal timeframes.
Lab information provided
BTLabs, West Palm Beach FL, with contact details and website. Lab appears to be a legitimate testing facility.
Core testing panels present
Identity (FTIR), purity (HPLC), potency, and endotoxin testing all performed. Heavy metals, microbial, and sterility panels not included but this is common for research peptides.
Potency slightly below label claim
Potency assay shows 4.5 mg (90%) vs. labeled 5 mg. This is within the stated specification of 90-110% but at the lower acceptance limit.
Professional formatting with supporting data
COA includes FTIR spectrum, HPLC chromatogram, detailed test results table, and signatures from two scientists. QR code present for verification.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.