Public COA audit

MOTS-C

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
88%
Panels
1/7

Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Heavy metals only - no identity or purity". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
MC202605
Issue date
2026-06-25

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · result on file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Class 1 metals < LOQ; Barium 0.815 µg, Aluminum 1.32 µg, Sodium 31.95 µg detected

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Heavy metals only - no identity or purity

    This COA contains ONLY heavy metals testing (EPA 208/245 methods). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, amino acid analysis), no purity (HPLC), no endotoxin, no microbial, no sterility, no residual solvents. The sample name includes 'HM' which likely indicates this is a heavy-metals-only report for this lot.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC, TLC, or other purity measurement provided. Cannot assess peptide purity from this document.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, amino acid sequencing, or other identity verification method present. Cannot confirm this is actually MOTS-C.

  • No sample/receipt date

    Document shows publication date 2026-06-25 but no sample receipt or analysis date. Cannot verify testing timeline.

  • Lab appears legitimate

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a known third-party testing lab in Michigan. Contact information and verification URL provided. Signatures from Ashlee Lust (President) and Joshua Lust (Managing Director) present.

  • Comprehensive heavy metals panel

    Extensive heavy metals testing via EPA methods covering ICH Q3D elemental impurities classes 1, 2a, 2b, and 3. All Class 1 metals (As, Cd, Pb, Hg) below detection limits.

  • Professional formatting

    Document has professional layout, QR code for verification, proper lab letterhead, and dual signatures. Formatting consistent with legitimate lab reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.