Public COA audit

MOTS-C

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
82%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
MC202605
Issue date
2026-06-25

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · result on file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Class 1 metals below detection limits; Barium 0.815 µg, Aluminum 1.32 µg, Sodium 31.95 µg detected

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity testing

    This COA contains only heavy metals testing. No HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity analysis is present. For a peptide product, purity and identity confirmation are essential.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the sample is actually MOTS-C.

  • Limited scope - metals only

    This appears to be a heavy metals-only report. While the metals panel is comprehensive (ICH Q3D classes), it does not constitute a complete COA for a peptide product without purity and identity data.

  • Lab information present

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL, and QR code provided. Lab appears to be a real entity in Dorr, MI.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Client SID MC202605 and internal Sample ID SPL-4099 both documented.

  • Issue date present

    Published date of 2026-06-25 is clearly stated and is before today (2026-07-29).

  • No sample receipt/collection date

    Only the publication date is provided. Sample receipt or collection date would strengthen traceability.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.