Public COA audit
Ipamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- IP202606
- Issue date
- 2026-06-26
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All Class 1 metals below detection limits; trace amounts of Barium (0.51 µg), Copper (1.045 µg), Aluminum (1.025 µg), Calcium (17.2 µg), Sodium (17.45 µg), Magnesium (5.95 µg), Zinc (0.875 µg)
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity testing
This COA contains only heavy metals testing. No HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity analysis is present. For a peptide product, absence of purity data is a critical gap.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method is documented. Cannot verify the sample is actually Ipamorelin.
Limited scope - heavy metals only
This report only covers elemental/heavy metals analysis via EPA methods. No microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing is included.
Batch/lot number present
Client SID IP202606 and internal sample ID SPL-4156 are clearly documented.
Lab identification present
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, and verification URL/key provided.
Professional presentation
Document has consistent branding, QR code for verification, dual signatures (President and Managing Director), and structured layout typical of a legitimate lab report.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.