@moderndaymama1
1 post audited · 6 claims analysed
Science evidence grade
Based on 6 claims across 1 audit
3
Supported
50%
1
Overstated
17%
0
Misleading
0%
2
No Evidence
33%
Share this evidence grade
Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards
What @moderndaymama1 claims actually are
We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).
Evidence-based
50%
3 claims
Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.
Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.
Factually incorrect
0%
0 claims
Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.
Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.
Grey / overstated
50%
3 claims
Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.
Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.
Evidence mix
Share of audited claims in each bucket
Verdict detail
Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support
Claims over time
Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade
Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).
Audit history(1 post)
“✨ I started peptide therapy and here’s what happened that I did not expect… ✨ — Inflammation? Way down, like instantly. — Blood sugar? More balanced. — Insulin resistance? Improved…my body actually processes food better now! — Hormones? Helping w/ PMS (a miracle tbh). — PCOS? Super supportive — Cravings? Suddenly WANTING healthy foods?? — Energy? Steady all day — no 2pm crash. — Metabolism? Finally working for me, not against me 😭👏🏼 — Nervous system? Calmer… anxiety way lower. — And yes… it’s incredible for weight loss too. Comment “PEPTIDES” and I’ll send you where I get mine!! #peptides #wellness #fitness #hormones #momsofinstagram”
Three claims (peptide messenger function, blood sugar balance, GLP-1 agonist mechanisms) are supported by credible evidence spanning basic biochemistry and human clinical trials. One claim (GLP-1 microdosing for wellness independent of weight loss) is overstated—GLP-1 benefits are well-documented, but 'microdosing' and non-metabolic 'wellness' applications lack peer-reviewed support. Three claims (inflammation reduction, insulin resistance improvement, PMS symptom relief) have no identifiable literature support and should not be represented without evidence. The post's foundational concepts are sound, but application scope exceeds current scientific documentation.
Audit another post from @moderndaymama1
Paste their Instagram link to add a new audit