@maximustribe

1 post audited · 2 claims analysed

Instagram profile

Science evidence grade

100%High evidence grade

Based on 2 claims across 1 audit

SupportedOverstatedMisleadingNo Evidence

2

Supported

100%

0

Overstated

0%

0

Misleading

0%

0

No Evidence

0%

Share this evidence grade

Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards

What @maximustribe claims actually are

We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).

Evidence-based

100%

2 claims

Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.

Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.

Factually incorrect

0%

0 claims

Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.

Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.

Grey / overstated

0%

0 claims

Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.

Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.

Evidence mix

Share of audited claims in each bucket

Loading…
BackedIncorrectGrey

Verdict detail

Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support

Loading…

Claims over time

Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade

Loading…

Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).

Audit history(1 post)

Post thumbnail
Supported
Jul 10, 2026·1 day ago·View post

The truth about Turkesterone💡 #supplements #nutrition #doctorsofinstagram #moreplatesmoredates

Both claims about trichosterone lack any supporting scientific literature. No peer-reviewed studies (animal, human, or in-vitro), clinical trial registrations, or published research were found for this compound or its purported anabolic or testosterone-raising effects. The absence of any evidence—not even preliminary animal work—means these claims cannot be evaluated against the scientific record and should be treated as unsubstantiated until credible literature emerges.

3 viewsView full audit

Audit another post from @maximustribe

Paste their Instagram link to add a new audit

New audit