COA transparency
The state of the peptide market
Public, moderator-approved certificate audits submitted through PeptIQ. Updated from live data · September 11, 2026 12:48 PM. Unapproved uploads and directory applications stay private until review.
Community-sourced
Help build the COA record
PeptIQ’s market snapshot comes from moderator-approved certificates and curated peptide brands and testing laboratories — not invented stats. Contribute a COA or claim your listing.
Community submissions are reviewed before they appear on public market pages. Private COA scans stay private until you share them.
Brand owners: claim or list your peptide brand, upload COAs tied to it in the app, then track trust scores on your public brand page and the COA market.
Upload a COA
Scan a certificate of analysis in the app. Public shares go through review before the market.
List / claim a peptide brand
Apply to list or claim your vendor profile. Listings stay unpublished until PeptIQ approves them.
Claim / list a testing laboratory
Third-party peptide testing labs (HPLC, endotoxin, etc.) can claim or request a directory presence.
See brand trust & reputation
Browse vendor trust scores and legitimacy from moderator-approved public COAs on the market.
Public COAs audited
1243
1274 approved public on file (pipeline in progress)
Avg legitimacy
83.5
Among complete COA reviews
High-concern reports
25
2% likely_fake among audited public COAs
Avg thoroughness
77%
2.23 of 7 panels on average
Thorough COAs
130
10% with purity + endotoxin + heavy metals + sterility
Compounds ranked
40
n ≥ 3 public audits
Verdict mix
How public audits land across PeptIQ legitimacy verdicts.
Legitimacy score distribution
Histogram of 0–100 legitimacy scores on approved public COAs.
Certificates by issue month
Volume of public audited certificates dated by the lab’s issue date — shows when testing activity concentrated.
Compound performance
Ranked by average PeptIQ legitimacy score on public approved audits. Primary compound name from each COA (light alias / dosage normalization). Requires ≥3 samples so one-offs don’t dominate. Purity shown only when reported on the certificate. Browse all peptide COAs to filter by date and quality for a specific compound.
Top compounds by legitimacy
Horizontal bars are avg legitimacy (0–100). Tooltip includes sample size and avg purity when available.
Leaderboard detail
High-concern rate = share of likely_fake only. Soft legitimate_with_concerns notes are excluded. Thoroughness uses core panels when available.
Swipe to view all columnsScroll horizontally to view all columns
COA thoroughness
Vendor ranking now emphasizes lot-aware core-panel coverage (identity, purity, endotoxin), which is weighted strongly in trust. Vendors often split those panels across sibling PDFs for the same lot, so a single purity-only file can look sparse even when the lot has a separate endotoxin report. The seven-panel file checklist still appears in per-document detail.
- noneNo panels marked present
- partialSome panels present but not thorough and not purity-sparse
- thoroughPurity + endotoxin + heavy metals + sterility all present
- purity sparsePurity present but missing endotoxin, heavy metals, and sterility
Panel profiles
How complete public COAs are relative to the thorough bar.
Market panel coverage
% of public audited COAs where each panel type is marked present.
Thoroughness score distribution
Buckets of panels-present ÷ 7 × 100 across public approved COAs.
Vendor thoroughness
Vendors with ≥3 public COAs, ranked by lot-aware core-panel coverage.
Thoroughness by vendor
Thorough = all four of purity, endotoxin, heavy metals, sterility. Purity-sparse = purity present but those three safety panels missing.
Swipe to view all columnsScroll horizontally to view all columns
Thoroughness by lab
Same definitions, rolled up by matched testing lab (≥3 public COAs).
Swipe to view all columnsScroll horizontally to view all columns
Vendor trust comparison
Scored vendors only (≥3 audited COAs). Bars are PeptIQ trust scores, not purity claims.
Lab trust comparison
Active testing labs ranked by trust score from sample size, panel breadth, and related signals.
Vendors by COA activity
Inline trust and legitimacy bars. Flagged mini-bars show concern/fabrication share vs clean.
Swipe to view all columnsScroll horizontally to view all columns
Labs on file
Panel breadth is average coverage across the seven standard peptide COA panels.
Swipe to view all columnsScroll horizontally to view all columns
Community-sourced
Help build the COA record
PeptIQ’s market snapshot comes from moderator-approved certificates and curated peptide brands and testing laboratories — not invented stats. Contribute a COA or claim your listing.
Community submissions are reviewed before they appear on public market pages. Private COA scans stay private until you share them.
Brand owners: claim or list your peptide brand, upload COAs tied to it in the app, then track trust scores on your public brand page and the COA market.
Upload a COA
Scan a certificate of analysis in the app. Public shares go through review before the market.
List / claim a peptide brand
Apply to list or claim your vendor profile. Listings stay unpublished until PeptIQ approves them.
Claim / list a testing laboratory
Third-party peptide testing labs (HPLC, endotoxin, etc.) can claim or request a directory presence.
See brand trust & reputation
Browse vendor trust scores and legitimacy from moderator-approved public COAs on the market.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.